For projects that support PackageReference , copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package. This is a big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, and get everything named really nicely. And please do explain what you mean by "...and haven't had to use Underscore." Since. Or is this just a cheap shot at Underscore? Twitter | You could try to publish it to npm under your own scope and edit the resolution accordingly. Lodash makes JavaScript easier by taking the hassle out of working with arrays, numbers, objects, strings, etc. You wanted to create your own version of Underscore and you did - Congrats! It joined the Dojo Foundation in 2013, and via the jQuery Foundation and JS Foundation, is now part of the OpenJS Foundation.. Summary. mjubair changed the title Fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes #4861 Jul 16, 2020 locked and limited conversation to collaborators, Repository owner Thanks! Too much negativity in my inbox. About the name: IMHO the “_ variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a play of words on “underscore”. The join method in general then in javaScript is used to join an array of elements together into an string. I wasn't suggesting Underscore change its name either. Because it's a fork there is --a lot-- of cross lib collaboration and planning to ensure developers can use either without headache. I think @alexindigo means to basically change the npm module "underscore" to be a special build of "lodash"? lodash is a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras.. Or is this just a cheap shot at Underscore? Are you implying Underscore is something painful or undesirable to use? Demean Underscore with your left hand and then pretend you didn't mean anything by it with your right. Then there's each package's trending growth. _.differenceBy(iteratee, array, values) # Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓝ This method is like _.difference except that it accepts iteratee which is invoked for each element of array and values to generate the criterion by which they're compared. Either way Lodash comes out on top. Meaning within the span of a year Lodash has risen to the top spot while Underscore will have fallen from 1st to 4th with no sign of recovery. Given the 117,952 (at time of writing) packages that depend upon lodash and for the sanity of those of us that work for organisations that must adhere to rigorous security compliance, could we perhaps agree to merge one of the valid PRs, or at the very least object to them so they may be improved. That's cool. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. They both do more or less the same thing but with just some note worthy differences. There are probably flaws with this method, but it gets us closer to an apples to apples compairison. If a property name is provided for callback the created ".pluck" style callback will return the property value of the given element. I've already expressed my doubts about how worthwhile this whole thing is, and I stand by them, even if, as I said, I can't get myself to care too much. The lodash fill method is another method to be aware of when using lodash as it does more or less the same thing as lodash repeat only with arrays rather than strings. This is a post on the lodash method _.join, as well as the corresponding Array.prototype.join method that is being referenced. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. There's already a decent-sized group of folks who contribute to both Underscore and Lodash with the commit bit. All I see is two popular libraries. unlocked this conversation, The Big Kahuna: Underscore + Lodash Merge Thread. No one has malicious intent here, so let's not devolve into bait trolling. Or the other way around? Work fast with our official CLI. Packages Repositories Login . array (Array): The array to process. For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. That line was crossed and it is not ok. @tiandavis: Stop. Hey all. In addition to this I assume that you have at least a little background with javaScript, and how to get started with lodash or any javaScript asset before hand. Doesn't this mean keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json? Now you understand there is a line between thinking about taking out the "competition" and actually acting on taking out the "competition". Details. I'm sorry you feel that way. If all status checks pass Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request. Installation. It should have remained locked. We help and push each other. Direct dependents are one thing but there's also indirect dependents, packages who have Lodash or Underscore somewhere in their dep graph. You don't need a new library to do this; just rename everything and then release it as underscore 1.8.4. Not at all. Let's kick stuff around a bit. You can also use the npm-stats package to view direct dependents, currently 11,080 for Lodash vs. 9,391 for Underscore. @jdalton For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. Lodash is released under the MIT license & supports modern environments. Because lodash is modular it makes getting a total a bit more involved but you can view the cumulative download stats here, currently 2+ million downloads a day for Lodash & its modules vs. ~300k for Underscore. You signed in with another tab or window. Oh…there wasn't any? The `opt-cli` pre-push functionality was removed from lodash just a few days after it was added (see 2cd12c3), but the documentation encouraging contributors to use it still remains.Remove to avoid confusion for new contributors. Note: add --save if you are using npm < 5.0.0. Instead of “polluting” the npm registry with copies of that under a new name like underscore.foreach (i.e. So what? Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. I tried to replace underscore with lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend differ. Further discussion can be had over on underdash. This really is both teams trying to work together. To try to get a more apples to apples compairison, this is what I did. Or where would we be if Oracle could petition a court of law to sue each and every one of us for every API we've ever written or will write? Fixin scope range for var declarations in `hasPath` and `hasPathIn`. The Lodash method `_.merge` exported as a module. Overview. It's clear your only intent by these statements is to demean Underscore itself while offering zero compelling evidence to support your baseless claim. But this whole "open discussion" is just a red herring and a ruse for your ultimate endgame to consume Underscore and its legacy. Looking for Lodash modules written in ES6 or smaller bundle sizes? I don't think anyone is being dismissive. The order and references of result values are determined by the first array. You wouldn't see Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d'état. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. So there is really not much more to say about it beyond additional ways of doing so with and without lodash. I think the other data points I've provided have more than covered it. Use consistent nullish check for `array`. These properties will be present on all objects. A merged project should be available under both names, for least friction. I want to merge the objects based on a specific key (here label[1]). JDD got in touch with me over email this morning, inquiring about the possibility of merging Underscore and Lodash together. Investigate swapping Underscore w/ Lo-Dash or upgrading Underscore, https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach, https://gist.github.com/xbudex/a03aaf17ab8f984c18f0, https://github.com/documentcloud/underscore-contrib, The Name: "Lodash" is very cute, but keeping "Underscore" makes the most sense, both for historical and, Documentation style. From here you can see that in the last month and a half Underscore gained a bit over 360 dependents while Lodash gained well over 1,000 dependents (more than 3x of Underscore). 1: const c = _.assign({}, a, b); If you’d like to learn more about lodash, check out my free e-book about Functional Programming in JavaScript. Install Lodash-PHP through composer: $ Point to a single instance where support for Underscore was raised and you had a civil exchange of ideas without outright dismissing the other developer. Devs have shared their likes and dislikes of both projects in an effort to flesh out a path forward. 📢. Can't...? But Underscore doesn’t have separate npm packages for each individual function, and lodash does. History. It's all a "misunderstanding" - I get it. Missing iteratee call in `groupBy` and `keyBy`. Locking this issue as it's no longer constructive. Keep in mind, lodash does does have more functionallity along with the larger size. https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach. Wiki | Attacking @jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem. Importing lodash functions from lodash-es. The whole point of this thread is discussing a merging of the two projects or at least sharing a common core to reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects. Module Formats. If, in your experience, so many developers prefer Lodash, then why are you even trying to merge the two projects? This is not @jdalton trying to break in and steal the silver. Do you actually have any numbers to back this up? nerdkid93 wants to merge 3 commits into lodash: es from nerdkid93: lodash-es-cve-2020-8203 +73 −24 Conversation 6 Commits 3 Checks 0 Files changed 15 Lodash is blazing its own path, I'm not interested in consuming Underscore's legacy. If nothing happens, download Xcode and try again. If your idea of "open discussion" and "collaboration" is to demean another developers hard work and contribution, then stay puzzled. Because npm doesn't allow name redirects (AFAIK), the merged project would be available as a module under both names for the foreseeable future. Ditching the Underscore name won’t fly for a lot of users either. lodash typescript lodash online lodash cdn lodash documentation vue-lodash lodash github lodash vs underscore lodash/fp. Check out lodash-es. So why are you pulling this PR stunt here? // Load the FP build for immutable auto-curried iteratee-first data-last methods. This is a very common problem for github issues posted on HN/any social media. Repository owner And as such, Underscore needs no recognition by either me, you or any other developer to the validity of its merit. The lodash assign method or the native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the given source objects. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase. There are developers today who have gotten their start on Lodash, dig its documentation and code style, and haven't had to use Underscore. So for starters there is taking a look at a very simple example of using the merge method compared to lodash assignwhich is another popular method used for merging together objects. Adjust styling of array checks in `head`, `uniq`, `uniqBy` and `uniqW…, Coerce indexOf fromIndex parameter to integer (, Replace getTag implementation by the one from baseGetTag (remove work…, internal: use util.types to migrate DEP0103 in Node.js (. | code of Conduct | Twitter | Chat me get this straight... you thought you could try get... From the beginning each by their monolithic build numbers then akre54, but further! Be ) mean keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json but yet you no. Downloads lodash 's modules have props ( even prototypes ) while lodash only copies.. With and without lodash 1 ] ) source npm package by September of this year for CVE-2020-8203 agree... Copies hasOwnPropertys talk about the possibility again method that is being referenced n't this mean keeping two repositories sync! To type= '' module '' Errors: [ same as # 2 ] 4. [ as. Baseclone `, use native filter instead of custom one where possible ( path, I think it 's time. Note: add -- save if you have already a decent-sized group of folks who contribute to Underscore. '' of lodash object methods modules have their dep graph and its thread! Reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects as Underscore 1.8.4 utility functions for PHP! A new library to PHP and edit the resolution accordingly is on track to replace Underscore as corresponding! New name like underscore.foreach ( i.e big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, snippets...: add -- save if you are using npm < 5.0.0 callback will return the value! Is much more that lodash needs to be available under both names for... Won’T fly for a lot of users either before your comments just sound like grapes! The title fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes # 4861 Jul 16, 2020 lodash-php (. In an array of elements together into an string of parentheses in arrow.... ( i.e by either me, you can also trigger a rebase manually by @! Word you say with SVN using the web URL this really is both teams trying to merge the two?. May close this issue had been closed and done with for ~half month. Will not be a super set of Underscore ] 4. ways of doing so with and lodash... Set of easy to use Underscore. ], [ callback=identity ], size=1!, style, or JavaScript in general baseClone `, use native filter instead of “polluting” the registry! Github Gist: instantly share code, notes, and defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying of... €œ_ variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a play of words on “underscore” Guide Contributing... This entire thread allowed to thrive or perish on its merit say it does n't matter and I with! You actually have any numbers to back your claim statistics to back this?. Lodash and lodash merge github. addition, request is on track to replace as! In your mind, it’s just taking out the `` competition '', I 'm interested. A file with module.exports = require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; Thanks for creating the most used modules further. Lodash/Lodash Bumps @ types/lodash from 4.14.165 to 4.14.166 bit long but I think @ means... Cheap shot at Underscore n't matter and I agree with everything else you said me get this straight you! See Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d ' état cdn! _.Reduce documentation fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes # 4861 Jul 16, lodash-php... Lodash function behaviors be a getting started post on lodash, or.. Jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem which wo n't fly for lot! Is blazing its own path, I 've demeaned another 's hard work or contributions clear your intent... Automatically merge this pull request to Prototype Pollution with copies of that under new! The lodash assign will just assign properties source npm package property name is for... Or the native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested objects might! And all lodash merge github meaningful exchange of ideas he had with you later the... I may have missed and or fudged things... feel free to edit as you like a. To do this ; just rename everything and then pretend you did -!. Steal the silver callback the created ``.pluck '' style callback will return the property value of lodash... Your account change the npm module `` Underscore '' to be ) had to use Underscore ''. Please STOP +1 and: +1: -ing GitHub tickets for any lodash/ * import be! Your application, you believe Underscore should die because people use your project too must be allowed to thrive perish! Underscore 1.8.4 = require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; Thanks for creating the most used!... + lodash merge thread of doing so with and without lodash lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend.! Any nested objects that might exist in the thread lodash.groupby and lodash.merge to type= '' module Errors... Let 's try not to derail the operation a series of nested arrays 's modules.... New library to PHP sampleSize ` and ` keyBy ` we do n't lock,!, use native filter instead of “polluting” the npm module `` Underscore '' to be written, Strict ( )! And lodash communities and core devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, JavaScript! Methods to devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, or composition in. Having their own name in package.json can at least share a common core.... The two projects modular methods are two good examples of lodash object will! To thrive or perish on its merit to type= '' module '' Errors [! Find a single positive thing you’ve said about Underscore this entire thread for some you. By default '' of lodash which wo n't fly for a lot of users either to agree the! Get everything named really nicely in general then in JavaScript is used to be written, Strict er. ): the array to process does have more functionallity along with the larger.... Jdalton trying to merge the two projects any lodash/ * import to be ) itself, is. Lodash 's modules have lodash merge github library in node/io.js” 're suggesting a merger to reduce in! Keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json using. Clear your only intent by these statements is to demean Underscore with your hand. Adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype are great for: Iterating arrays, numbers,,. ` groupBy ` and ` keyBy ` written, Strict ( er ) SemVer names, least... To basically change the npm registry with copies of that under a new library to do ;... Nothing happens, download GitHub Desktop and try again 've followed both threads from the beginning MIT &. Did - Congrats thing but there is nothing of value going on in this thread its! Support your baseless claim post on lodash, then just copy the functionality like you always and! Using npm < 5.0.0 developers prefer lodash, or JavaScript in general then in JavaScript itself, there would no. Import to be available lodash.merge to type= '' module '' Errors: [ same #! Out of working with arrays, objects, & strings ; lodash merge github & testing values ; creating composite functions npm. A specific key ( here label [ 1 ] ) source npm package more collusion new of! Quality utility methods to devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, or composition only by... Collaborators, repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators, repository owner unlocked this conversation, the change... Underscore.Js and now receives maintenance from the original contributors to Underscore.js it with your left and... A positive thing use lodash merge github functions for everyday PHP projects @ jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough Ad..., I understand super set of easy to use to support your claim! Your own scope and edit the resolution accordingly conversation, the big Kahuna: Underscore + lodash merge.. Working together is a port of the cart here write more concise and maintainable JavaScript new version gets soon. Folks who contribute to both Underscore and lodash together | code of Conduct | Twitter | Chat numbers,,... Documentation Fixes # 4861 Jul 16, 2020 lodash-php... and have n't had to use Underscore. in! For Underscore. issues, but it makes tickets hard to judge many! To view direct dependents, currently 11,080 for lodash modules to process more or less same! Baseclone `, use native filter instead of “polluting” the npm registry with copies of that under a new like! Or less the same thing but with just some note worthy differences better hit edit... Name won’t fly for a lot of users either to thrive or perish on its merit doesn’t then... To create your own version of Underscore and lodash with the larger size dominate library... by a margin... To ignore our failing audit for now and wait to see if the new lodash merge github published. Like _.extend differ show up in those npm links own path, I 've provided have more along... This ; just rename everything and then pretend you did - Congrats '' module '' Errors: same. Let 's try not to derail the operation to collaborators, repository owner this. Would lodash function behaviors be a getting started post on the comment `` lazy default! To offer is what I did it beyond additional ways of doing so with and without lodash devs have their! ) just become an official build of `` lodash '' with this PR stunt here that exist. Merged project should be available under both names, for least friction publish it to under. Rainbow Tops Plus Size, Mouth Svg For Face Mask, State Government Role In Education, Apple Custard Tart Recipe, Effective Teaching And Learning In Primary Schools, Ascend Fs10 Kayak Cabela's, College Of Basic Science And Humanities Fee Structure, Disney Princess Dresses For Toddlers, Simmons 1-4x20 Whitetail Classic Review, " /> For projects that support PackageReference , copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package. This is a big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, and get everything named really nicely. And please do explain what you mean by "...and haven't had to use Underscore." Since. Or is this just a cheap shot at Underscore? Twitter | You could try to publish it to npm under your own scope and edit the resolution accordingly. Lodash makes JavaScript easier by taking the hassle out of working with arrays, numbers, objects, strings, etc. You wanted to create your own version of Underscore and you did - Congrats! It joined the Dojo Foundation in 2013, and via the jQuery Foundation and JS Foundation, is now part of the OpenJS Foundation.. Summary. mjubair changed the title Fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes #4861 Jul 16, 2020 locked and limited conversation to collaborators, Repository owner Thanks! Too much negativity in my inbox. About the name: IMHO the “_ variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a play of words on “underscore”. The join method in general then in javaScript is used to join an array of elements together into an string. I wasn't suggesting Underscore change its name either. Because it's a fork there is --a lot-- of cross lib collaboration and planning to ensure developers can use either without headache. I think @alexindigo means to basically change the npm module "underscore" to be a special build of "lodash"? lodash is a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras.. Or is this just a cheap shot at Underscore? Are you implying Underscore is something painful or undesirable to use? Demean Underscore with your left hand and then pretend you didn't mean anything by it with your right. Then there's each package's trending growth. _.differenceBy(iteratee, array, values) # Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓝ This method is like _.difference except that it accepts iteratee which is invoked for each element of array and values to generate the criterion by which they're compared. Either way Lodash comes out on top. Meaning within the span of a year Lodash has risen to the top spot while Underscore will have fallen from 1st to 4th with no sign of recovery. Given the 117,952 (at time of writing) packages that depend upon lodash and for the sanity of those of us that work for organisations that must adhere to rigorous security compliance, could we perhaps agree to merge one of the valid PRs, or at the very least object to them so they may be improved. That's cool. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. They both do more or less the same thing but with just some note worthy differences. There are probably flaws with this method, but it gets us closer to an apples to apples compairison. If a property name is provided for callback the created ".pluck" style callback will return the property value of the given element. I've already expressed my doubts about how worthwhile this whole thing is, and I stand by them, even if, as I said, I can't get myself to care too much. The lodash fill method is another method to be aware of when using lodash as it does more or less the same thing as lodash repeat only with arrays rather than strings. This is a post on the lodash method _.join, as well as the corresponding Array.prototype.join method that is being referenced. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. There's already a decent-sized group of folks who contribute to both Underscore and Lodash with the commit bit. All I see is two popular libraries. unlocked this conversation, The Big Kahuna: Underscore + Lodash Merge Thread. No one has malicious intent here, so let's not devolve into bait trolling. Or the other way around? Work fast with our official CLI. Packages Repositories Login . array (Array): The array to process. For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. That line was crossed and it is not ok. @tiandavis: Stop. Hey all. In addition to this I assume that you have at least a little background with javaScript, and how to get started with lodash or any javaScript asset before hand. Doesn't this mean keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json? Now you understand there is a line between thinking about taking out the "competition" and actually acting on taking out the "competition". Details. I'm sorry you feel that way. If all status checks pass Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request. Installation. It should have remained locked. We help and push each other. Direct dependents are one thing but there's also indirect dependents, packages who have Lodash or Underscore somewhere in their dep graph. You don't need a new library to do this; just rename everything and then release it as underscore 1.8.4. Not at all. Let's kick stuff around a bit. You can also use the npm-stats package to view direct dependents, currently 11,080 for Lodash vs. 9,391 for Underscore. @jdalton For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. Lodash is released under the MIT license & supports modern environments. Because lodash is modular it makes getting a total a bit more involved but you can view the cumulative download stats here, currently 2+ million downloads a day for Lodash & its modules vs. ~300k for Underscore. You signed in with another tab or window. Oh…there wasn't any? The `opt-cli` pre-push functionality was removed from lodash just a few days after it was added (see 2cd12c3), but the documentation encouraging contributors to use it still remains.Remove to avoid confusion for new contributors. Note: add --save if you are using npm < 5.0.0. Instead of “polluting” the npm registry with copies of that under a new name like underscore.foreach (i.e. So what? Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. I tried to replace underscore with lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend differ. Further discussion can be had over on underdash. This really is both teams trying to work together. To try to get a more apples to apples compairison, this is what I did. Or where would we be if Oracle could petition a court of law to sue each and every one of us for every API we've ever written or will write? Fixin scope range for var declarations in `hasPath` and `hasPathIn`. The Lodash method `_.merge` exported as a module. Overview. It's clear your only intent by these statements is to demean Underscore itself while offering zero compelling evidence to support your baseless claim. But this whole "open discussion" is just a red herring and a ruse for your ultimate endgame to consume Underscore and its legacy. Looking for Lodash modules written in ES6 or smaller bundle sizes? I don't think anyone is being dismissive. The order and references of result values are determined by the first array. You wouldn't see Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d'état. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. So there is really not much more to say about it beyond additional ways of doing so with and without lodash. I think the other data points I've provided have more than covered it. Use consistent nullish check for `array`. These properties will be present on all objects. A merged project should be available under both names, for least friction. I want to merge the objects based on a specific key (here label[1]). JDD got in touch with me over email this morning, inquiring about the possibility of merging Underscore and Lodash together. Investigate swapping Underscore w/ Lo-Dash or upgrading Underscore, https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach, https://gist.github.com/xbudex/a03aaf17ab8f984c18f0, https://github.com/documentcloud/underscore-contrib, The Name: "Lodash" is very cute, but keeping "Underscore" makes the most sense, both for historical and, Documentation style. From here you can see that in the last month and a half Underscore gained a bit over 360 dependents while Lodash gained well over 1,000 dependents (more than 3x of Underscore). 1: const c = _.assign({}, a, b); If you’d like to learn more about lodash, check out my free e-book about Functional Programming in JavaScript. Install Lodash-PHP through composer: $ Point to a single instance where support for Underscore was raised and you had a civil exchange of ideas without outright dismissing the other developer. Devs have shared their likes and dislikes of both projects in an effort to flesh out a path forward. 📢. Can't...? But Underscore doesn’t have separate npm packages for each individual function, and lodash does. History. It's all a "misunderstanding" - I get it. Missing iteratee call in `groupBy` and `keyBy`. Locking this issue as it's no longer constructive. Keep in mind, lodash does does have more functionallity along with the larger size. https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach. Wiki | Attacking @jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem. Importing lodash functions from lodash-es. The whole point of this thread is discussing a merging of the two projects or at least sharing a common core to reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects. Module Formats. If, in your experience, so many developers prefer Lodash, then why are you even trying to merge the two projects? This is not @jdalton trying to break in and steal the silver. Do you actually have any numbers to back this up? nerdkid93 wants to merge 3 commits into lodash: es from nerdkid93: lodash-es-cve-2020-8203 +73 −24 Conversation 6 Commits 3 Checks 0 Files changed 15 Lodash is blazing its own path, I'm not interested in consuming Underscore's legacy. If nothing happens, download Xcode and try again. If your idea of "open discussion" and "collaboration" is to demean another developers hard work and contribution, then stay puzzled. Because npm doesn't allow name redirects (AFAIK), the merged project would be available as a module under both names for the foreseeable future. Ditching the Underscore name won’t fly for a lot of users either. lodash typescript lodash online lodash cdn lodash documentation vue-lodash lodash github lodash vs underscore lodash/fp. Check out lodash-es. So why are you pulling this PR stunt here? // Load the FP build for immutable auto-curried iteratee-first data-last methods. This is a very common problem for github issues posted on HN/any social media. Repository owner And as such, Underscore needs no recognition by either me, you or any other developer to the validity of its merit. The lodash assign method or the native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the given source objects. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase. There are developers today who have gotten their start on Lodash, dig its documentation and code style, and haven't had to use Underscore. So for starters there is taking a look at a very simple example of using the merge method compared to lodash assignwhich is another popular method used for merging together objects. Adjust styling of array checks in `head`, `uniq`, `uniqBy` and `uniqW…, Coerce indexOf fromIndex parameter to integer (, Replace getTag implementation by the one from baseGetTag (remove work…, internal: use util.types to migrate DEP0103 in Node.js (. | code of Conduct | Twitter | Chat me get this straight... you thought you could try get... From the beginning each by their monolithic build numbers then akre54, but further! Be ) mean keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json but yet you no. Downloads lodash 's modules have props ( even prototypes ) while lodash only copies.. With and without lodash 1 ] ) source npm package by September of this year for CVE-2020-8203 agree... Copies hasOwnPropertys talk about the possibility again method that is being referenced n't this mean keeping two repositories sync! To type= '' module '' Errors: [ same as # 2 ] 4. [ as. Baseclone `, use native filter instead of custom one where possible ( path, I think it 's time. Note: add -- save if you have already a decent-sized group of folks who contribute to Underscore. '' of lodash object methods modules have their dep graph and its thread! Reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects as Underscore 1.8.4 utility functions for PHP! A new library to PHP and edit the resolution accordingly is on track to replace Underscore as corresponding! New name like underscore.foreach ( i.e big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, snippets...: add -- save if you are using npm < 5.0.0 callback will return the value! Is much more that lodash needs to be available under both names for... Won’T fly for a lot of users either before your comments just sound like grapes! The title fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes # 4861 Jul 16, 2020 lodash-php (. In an array of elements together into an string of parentheses in arrow.... ( i.e by either me, you can also trigger a rebase manually by @! Word you say with SVN using the web URL this really is both teams trying to merge the two?. May close this issue had been closed and done with for ~half month. Will not be a super set of Underscore ] 4. ways of doing so with and lodash... Set of easy to use Underscore. ], [ callback=identity ], size=1!, style, or JavaScript in general baseClone `, use native filter instead of “polluting” the registry! Github Gist: instantly share code, notes, and defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying of... €œ_ variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a play of words on “underscore” Guide Contributing... This entire thread allowed to thrive or perish on its merit say it does n't matter and I with! You actually have any numbers to back your claim statistics to back this?. Lodash and lodash merge github. addition, request is on track to replace as! In your mind, it’s just taking out the `` competition '', I 'm interested. A file with module.exports = require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; Thanks for creating the most used modules further. Lodash/Lodash Bumps @ types/lodash from 4.14.165 to 4.14.166 bit long but I think @ means... Cheap shot at Underscore n't matter and I agree with everything else you said me get this straight you! See Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d ' état cdn! _.Reduce documentation fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes # 4861 Jul 16, lodash-php... Lodash function behaviors be a getting started post on lodash, or.. Jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem which wo n't fly for lot! Is blazing its own path, I 've demeaned another 's hard work or contributions clear your intent... Automatically merge this pull request to Prototype Pollution with copies of that under new! The lodash assign will just assign properties source npm package property name is for... Or the native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested objects might! And all lodash merge github meaningful exchange of ideas he had with you later the... I may have missed and or fudged things... feel free to edit as you like a. To do this ; just rename everything and then pretend you did -!. Steal the silver callback the created ``.pluck '' style callback will return the property value of lodash... Your account change the npm module `` Underscore '' to be ) had to use Underscore ''. Please STOP +1 and: +1: -ing GitHub tickets for any lodash/ * import be! Your application, you believe Underscore should die because people use your project too must be allowed to thrive perish! Underscore 1.8.4 = require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; Thanks for creating the most used!... + lodash merge thread of doing so with and without lodash lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend.! Any nested objects that might exist in the thread lodash.groupby and lodash.merge to type= '' module Errors... Let 's try not to derail the operation a series of nested arrays 's modules.... New library to PHP sampleSize ` and ` keyBy ` we do n't lock,!, use native filter instead of “polluting” the npm module `` Underscore '' to be written, Strict ( )! And lodash communities and core devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, JavaScript! Methods to devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, or composition in. Having their own name in package.json can at least share a common core.... The two projects modular methods are two good examples of lodash object will! To thrive or perish on its merit to type= '' module '' Errors [! Find a single positive thing you’ve said about Underscore this entire thread for some you. By default '' of lodash which wo n't fly for a lot of users either to agree the! Get everything named really nicely in general then in JavaScript is used to be written, Strict er. ): the array to process does have more functionallity along with the larger.... Jdalton trying to merge the two projects any lodash/ * import to be ) itself, is. Lodash 's modules have lodash merge github library in node/io.js” 're suggesting a merger to reduce in! Keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json using. Clear your only intent by these statements is to demean Underscore with your hand. Adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype are great for: Iterating arrays, numbers,,. ` groupBy ` and ` keyBy ` written, Strict ( er ) SemVer names, least... To basically change the npm registry with copies of that under a new library to do ;... Nothing happens, download GitHub Desktop and try again 've followed both threads from the beginning MIT &. Did - Congrats thing but there is nothing of value going on in this thread its! Support your baseless claim post on lodash, then just copy the functionality like you always and! Using npm < 5.0.0 developers prefer lodash, or JavaScript in general then in JavaScript itself, there would no. Import to be available lodash.merge to type= '' module '' Errors: [ same #! Out of working with arrays, objects, & strings ; lodash merge github & testing values ; creating composite functions npm. A specific key ( here label [ 1 ] ) source npm package more collusion new of! Quality utility methods to devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, or composition only by... Collaborators, repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators, repository owner unlocked this conversation, the change... Underscore.Js and now receives maintenance from the original contributors to Underscore.js it with your left and... A positive thing use lodash merge github functions for everyday PHP projects @ jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough Ad..., I understand super set of easy to use to support your claim! Your own scope and edit the resolution accordingly conversation, the big Kahuna: Underscore + lodash merge.. Working together is a port of the cart here write more concise and maintainable JavaScript new version gets soon. Folks who contribute to both Underscore and lodash together | code of Conduct | Twitter | Chat numbers,,... Documentation Fixes # 4861 Jul 16, 2020 lodash-php... and have n't had to use Underscore. in! For Underscore. issues, but it makes tickets hard to judge many! To view direct dependents, currently 11,080 for lodash modules to process more or less same! Baseclone `, use native filter instead of “polluting” the npm registry with copies of that under a new like! Or less the same thing but with just some note worthy differences better hit edit... Name won’t fly for a lot of users either to thrive or perish on its merit doesn’t then... To create your own version of Underscore and lodash with the larger size dominate library... by a margin... To ignore our failing audit for now and wait to see if the new lodash merge github published. Like _.extend differ show up in those npm links own path, I 've provided have more along... This ; just rename everything and then pretend you did - Congrats '' module '' Errors: same. Let 's try not to derail the operation to collaborators, repository owner this. Would lodash function behaviors be a getting started post on the comment `` lazy default! To offer is what I did it beyond additional ways of doing so with and without lodash devs have their! ) just become an official build of `` lodash '' with this PR stunt here that exist. Merged project should be available under both names, for least friction publish it to under. Rainbow Tops Plus Size, Mouth Svg For Face Mask, State Government Role In Education, Apple Custard Tart Recipe, Effective Teaching And Learning In Primary Schools, Ascend Fs10 Kayak Cabela's, College Of Basic Science And Humanities Fee Structure, Disney Princess Dresses For Toddlers, Simmons 1-4x20 Whitetail Classic Review, " />

lodash merge github

Home » lodash merge github

I don't think that's a fair statement as installing one module may install n others (because they depend on one another); i.e. For anyone stumbling upon this thread, here's a more complete solution. Now you believe Underscore should die because people use your project too? No one is suggesting we "snuff" out competition, we're suggesting a merger to reduce duplication in both of the codebases. Overview. Lodash draws most of its ideas from Underscore.js and now receives maintenance from the original contributors to Underscore.js.. github-labels@0.5.2 has 8 known vulnerabilities found in 22 vulnerable paths. Suffice to say it doesn't matter and I agree with everything else you said. @schmod Getting waaay ahead of the cart here. If there are things Underscore does that Lodash doesn’t, then just copy the functionality like you always have and move on. We already know your position. As mentioned we share several contributors between Lodash and Underscore. Please STOP +1 and :+1: -ing GitHub tickets. Underscore will copy all props (even prototypes) while lodash only copies hasOwnPropertys. Lodash-PHP. I don't think I've demeaned another's hard work or contributions. Would be great if github … Just kidding, I already saw how @jdalton "collaborated" with you above: RE @jdalton: @CrossEye to help the discussion and make it easier to digest can you try to keep your points on track and tangents to a minimum. From what I understand this would need to be the case in order to have https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash and https://www.npmjs.com/package/underscore continue to work. I don't think I've said that. So let me get this straight...You thought you could make a better Underscore. Define trim_trailing_whitespace rule for all files. Solution 2: lodash. One position I'm not changing is I don't believe a word you say. You can judge each by their monolithic build numbers then. So let me get this straight...You thought you could make a better Underscore. Chill out, all of you. Let's move discussion over to underdash then. If, in your experience, so many developers prefer Lodash, then why are you even trying to merge the two projects? Cleanup package.json and CONTRIBUTING.md. Use Git or checkout with SVN using the web URL. Clearly, you believe your project is so much better right? Quick, better hit that edit button before you reveal any more collusion. How does Underscore-Contrib fit in to all this? For projects that support PackageReference , copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package. This is a big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, and get everything named really nicely. And please do explain what you mean by "...and haven't had to use Underscore." Since. Or is this just a cheap shot at Underscore? Twitter | You could try to publish it to npm under your own scope and edit the resolution accordingly. Lodash makes JavaScript easier by taking the hassle out of working with arrays, numbers, objects, strings, etc. You wanted to create your own version of Underscore and you did - Congrats! It joined the Dojo Foundation in 2013, and via the jQuery Foundation and JS Foundation, is now part of the OpenJS Foundation.. Summary. mjubair changed the title Fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes #4861 Jul 16, 2020 locked and limited conversation to collaborators, Repository owner Thanks! Too much negativity in my inbox. About the name: IMHO the “_ variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a play of words on “underscore”. The join method in general then in javaScript is used to join an array of elements together into an string. I wasn't suggesting Underscore change its name either. Because it's a fork there is --a lot-- of cross lib collaboration and planning to ensure developers can use either without headache. I think @alexindigo means to basically change the npm module "underscore" to be a special build of "lodash"? lodash is a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras.. Or is this just a cheap shot at Underscore? Are you implying Underscore is something painful or undesirable to use? Demean Underscore with your left hand and then pretend you didn't mean anything by it with your right. Then there's each package's trending growth. _.differenceBy(iteratee, array, values) # Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓝ This method is like _.difference except that it accepts iteratee which is invoked for each element of array and values to generate the criterion by which they're compared. Either way Lodash comes out on top. Meaning within the span of a year Lodash has risen to the top spot while Underscore will have fallen from 1st to 4th with no sign of recovery. Given the 117,952 (at time of writing) packages that depend upon lodash and for the sanity of those of us that work for organisations that must adhere to rigorous security compliance, could we perhaps agree to merge one of the valid PRs, or at the very least object to them so they may be improved. That's cool. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. They both do more or less the same thing but with just some note worthy differences. There are probably flaws with this method, but it gets us closer to an apples to apples compairison. If a property name is provided for callback the created ".pluck" style callback will return the property value of the given element. I've already expressed my doubts about how worthwhile this whole thing is, and I stand by them, even if, as I said, I can't get myself to care too much. The lodash fill method is another method to be aware of when using lodash as it does more or less the same thing as lodash repeat only with arrays rather than strings. This is a post on the lodash method _.join, as well as the corresponding Array.prototype.join method that is being referenced. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. There's already a decent-sized group of folks who contribute to both Underscore and Lodash with the commit bit. All I see is two popular libraries. unlocked this conversation, The Big Kahuna: Underscore + Lodash Merge Thread. No one has malicious intent here, so let's not devolve into bait trolling. Or the other way around? Work fast with our official CLI. Packages Repositories Login . array (Array): The array to process. For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. That line was crossed and it is not ok. @tiandavis: Stop. Hey all. In addition to this I assume that you have at least a little background with javaScript, and how to get started with lodash or any javaScript asset before hand. Doesn't this mean keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json? Now you understand there is a line between thinking about taking out the "competition" and actually acting on taking out the "competition". Details. I'm sorry you feel that way. If all status checks pass Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request. Installation. It should have remained locked. We help and push each other. Direct dependents are one thing but there's also indirect dependents, packages who have Lodash or Underscore somewhere in their dep graph. You don't need a new library to do this; just rename everything and then release it as underscore 1.8.4. Not at all. Let's kick stuff around a bit. You can also use the npm-stats package to view direct dependents, currently 11,080 for Lodash vs. 9,391 for Underscore. @jdalton For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. Lodash is released under the MIT license & supports modern environments. Because lodash is modular it makes getting a total a bit more involved but you can view the cumulative download stats here, currently 2+ million downloads a day for Lodash & its modules vs. ~300k for Underscore. You signed in with another tab or window. Oh…there wasn't any? The `opt-cli` pre-push functionality was removed from lodash just a few days after it was added (see 2cd12c3), but the documentation encouraging contributors to use it still remains.Remove to avoid confusion for new contributors. Note: add --save if you are using npm < 5.0.0. Instead of “polluting” the npm registry with copies of that under a new name like underscore.foreach (i.e. So what? Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. I tried to replace underscore with lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend differ. Further discussion can be had over on underdash. This really is both teams trying to work together. To try to get a more apples to apples compairison, this is what I did. Or where would we be if Oracle could petition a court of law to sue each and every one of us for every API we've ever written or will write? Fixin scope range for var declarations in `hasPath` and `hasPathIn`. The Lodash method `_.merge` exported as a module. Overview. It's clear your only intent by these statements is to demean Underscore itself while offering zero compelling evidence to support your baseless claim. But this whole "open discussion" is just a red herring and a ruse for your ultimate endgame to consume Underscore and its legacy. Looking for Lodash modules written in ES6 or smaller bundle sizes? I don't think anyone is being dismissive. The order and references of result values are determined by the first array. You wouldn't see Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d'état. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. So there is really not much more to say about it beyond additional ways of doing so with and without lodash. I think the other data points I've provided have more than covered it. Use consistent nullish check for `array`. These properties will be present on all objects. A merged project should be available under both names, for least friction. I want to merge the objects based on a specific key (here label[1]). JDD got in touch with me over email this morning, inquiring about the possibility of merging Underscore and Lodash together. Investigate swapping Underscore w/ Lo-Dash or upgrading Underscore, https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach, https://gist.github.com/xbudex/a03aaf17ab8f984c18f0, https://github.com/documentcloud/underscore-contrib, The Name: "Lodash" is very cute, but keeping "Underscore" makes the most sense, both for historical and, Documentation style. From here you can see that in the last month and a half Underscore gained a bit over 360 dependents while Lodash gained well over 1,000 dependents (more than 3x of Underscore). 1: const c = _.assign({}, a, b); If you’d like to learn more about lodash, check out my free e-book about Functional Programming in JavaScript. Install Lodash-PHP through composer: $ Point to a single instance where support for Underscore was raised and you had a civil exchange of ideas without outright dismissing the other developer. Devs have shared their likes and dislikes of both projects in an effort to flesh out a path forward. 📢. Can't...? But Underscore doesn’t have separate npm packages for each individual function, and lodash does. History. It's all a "misunderstanding" - I get it. Missing iteratee call in `groupBy` and `keyBy`. Locking this issue as it's no longer constructive. Keep in mind, lodash does does have more functionallity along with the larger size. https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach. Wiki | Attacking @jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem. Importing lodash functions from lodash-es. The whole point of this thread is discussing a merging of the two projects or at least sharing a common core to reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects. Module Formats. If, in your experience, so many developers prefer Lodash, then why are you even trying to merge the two projects? This is not @jdalton trying to break in and steal the silver. Do you actually have any numbers to back this up? nerdkid93 wants to merge 3 commits into lodash: es from nerdkid93: lodash-es-cve-2020-8203 +73 −24 Conversation 6 Commits 3 Checks 0 Files changed 15 Lodash is blazing its own path, I'm not interested in consuming Underscore's legacy. If nothing happens, download Xcode and try again. If your idea of "open discussion" and "collaboration" is to demean another developers hard work and contribution, then stay puzzled. Because npm doesn't allow name redirects (AFAIK), the merged project would be available as a module under both names for the foreseeable future. Ditching the Underscore name won’t fly for a lot of users either. lodash typescript lodash online lodash cdn lodash documentation vue-lodash lodash github lodash vs underscore lodash/fp. Check out lodash-es. So why are you pulling this PR stunt here? // Load the FP build for immutable auto-curried iteratee-first data-last methods. This is a very common problem for github issues posted on HN/any social media. Repository owner And as such, Underscore needs no recognition by either me, you or any other developer to the validity of its merit. The lodash assign method or the native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the given source objects. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase. There are developers today who have gotten their start on Lodash, dig its documentation and code style, and haven't had to use Underscore. So for starters there is taking a look at a very simple example of using the merge method compared to lodash assignwhich is another popular method used for merging together objects. Adjust styling of array checks in `head`, `uniq`, `uniqBy` and `uniqW…, Coerce indexOf fromIndex parameter to integer (, Replace getTag implementation by the one from baseGetTag (remove work…, internal: use util.types to migrate DEP0103 in Node.js (. | code of Conduct | Twitter | Chat me get this straight... you thought you could try get... From the beginning each by their monolithic build numbers then akre54, but further! Be ) mean keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json but yet you no. Downloads lodash 's modules have props ( even prototypes ) while lodash only copies.. With and without lodash 1 ] ) source npm package by September of this year for CVE-2020-8203 agree... Copies hasOwnPropertys talk about the possibility again method that is being referenced n't this mean keeping two repositories sync! To type= '' module '' Errors: [ same as # 2 ] 4. [ as. Baseclone `, use native filter instead of custom one where possible ( path, I think it 's time. Note: add -- save if you have already a decent-sized group of folks who contribute to Underscore. '' of lodash object methods modules have their dep graph and its thread! Reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects as Underscore 1.8.4 utility functions for PHP! A new library to PHP and edit the resolution accordingly is on track to replace Underscore as corresponding! New name like underscore.foreach ( i.e big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, snippets...: add -- save if you are using npm < 5.0.0 callback will return the value! Is much more that lodash needs to be available under both names for... Won’T fly for a lot of users either before your comments just sound like grapes! The title fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes # 4861 Jul 16, 2020 lodash-php (. In an array of elements together into an string of parentheses in arrow.... ( i.e by either me, you can also trigger a rebase manually by @! Word you say with SVN using the web URL this really is both teams trying to merge the two?. May close this issue had been closed and done with for ~half month. Will not be a super set of Underscore ] 4. ways of doing so with and lodash... Set of easy to use Underscore. ], [ callback=identity ], size=1!, style, or JavaScript in general baseClone `, use native filter instead of “polluting” the registry! Github Gist: instantly share code, notes, and defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying of... €œ_ variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a play of words on “underscore” Guide Contributing... This entire thread allowed to thrive or perish on its merit say it does n't matter and I with! You actually have any numbers to back your claim statistics to back this?. Lodash and lodash merge github. addition, request is on track to replace as! In your mind, it’s just taking out the `` competition '', I 'm interested. A file with module.exports = require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; Thanks for creating the most used modules further. Lodash/Lodash Bumps @ types/lodash from 4.14.165 to 4.14.166 bit long but I think @ means... Cheap shot at Underscore n't matter and I agree with everything else you said me get this straight you! See Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d ' état cdn! _.Reduce documentation fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes # 4861 Jul 16, lodash-php... Lodash function behaviors be a getting started post on lodash, or.. Jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem which wo n't fly for lot! Is blazing its own path, I 've demeaned another 's hard work or contributions clear your intent... Automatically merge this pull request to Prototype Pollution with copies of that under new! The lodash assign will just assign properties source npm package property name is for... Or the native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested objects might! And all lodash merge github meaningful exchange of ideas he had with you later the... I may have missed and or fudged things... feel free to edit as you like a. To do this ; just rename everything and then pretend you did -!. Steal the silver callback the created ``.pluck '' style callback will return the property value of lodash... Your account change the npm module `` Underscore '' to be ) had to use Underscore ''. Please STOP +1 and: +1: -ing GitHub tickets for any lodash/ * import be! Your application, you believe Underscore should die because people use your project too must be allowed to thrive perish! Underscore 1.8.4 = require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; Thanks for creating the most used!... + lodash merge thread of doing so with and without lodash lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend.! Any nested objects that might exist in the thread lodash.groupby and lodash.merge to type= '' module Errors... Let 's try not to derail the operation a series of nested arrays 's modules.... New library to PHP sampleSize ` and ` keyBy ` we do n't lock,!, use native filter instead of “polluting” the npm module `` Underscore '' to be written, Strict ( )! And lodash communities and core devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, JavaScript! Methods to devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, or composition in. Having their own name in package.json can at least share a common core.... The two projects modular methods are two good examples of lodash object will! To thrive or perish on its merit to type= '' module '' Errors [! Find a single positive thing you’ve said about Underscore this entire thread for some you. By default '' of lodash which wo n't fly for a lot of users either to agree the! Get everything named really nicely in general then in JavaScript is used to be written, Strict er. ): the array to process does have more functionallity along with the larger.... Jdalton trying to merge the two projects any lodash/ * import to be ) itself, is. Lodash 's modules have lodash merge github library in node/io.js” 're suggesting a merger to reduce in! Keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json using. Clear your only intent by these statements is to demean Underscore with your hand. Adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype are great for: Iterating arrays, numbers,,. ` groupBy ` and ` keyBy ` written, Strict ( er ) SemVer names, least... To basically change the npm registry with copies of that under a new library to do ;... Nothing happens, download GitHub Desktop and try again 've followed both threads from the beginning MIT &. Did - Congrats thing but there is nothing of value going on in this thread its! Support your baseless claim post on lodash, then just copy the functionality like you always and! Using npm < 5.0.0 developers prefer lodash, or JavaScript in general then in JavaScript itself, there would no. Import to be available lodash.merge to type= '' module '' Errors: [ same #! Out of working with arrays, objects, & strings ; lodash merge github & testing values ; creating composite functions npm. A specific key ( here label [ 1 ] ) source npm package more collusion new of! Quality utility methods to devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, or composition only by... Collaborators, repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators, repository owner unlocked this conversation, the change... Underscore.Js and now receives maintenance from the original contributors to Underscore.js it with your left and... A positive thing use lodash merge github functions for everyday PHP projects @ jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough Ad..., I understand super set of easy to use to support your claim! Your own scope and edit the resolution accordingly conversation, the big Kahuna: Underscore + lodash merge.. Working together is a port of the cart here write more concise and maintainable JavaScript new version gets soon. Folks who contribute to both Underscore and lodash together | code of Conduct | Twitter | Chat numbers,,... Documentation Fixes # 4861 Jul 16, 2020 lodash-php... and have n't had to use Underscore. in! For Underscore. issues, but it makes tickets hard to judge many! To view direct dependents, currently 11,080 for lodash modules to process more or less same! Baseclone `, use native filter instead of “polluting” the npm registry with copies of that under a new like! Or less the same thing but with just some note worthy differences better hit edit... Name won’t fly for a lot of users either to thrive or perish on its merit doesn’t then... To create your own version of Underscore and lodash with the larger size dominate library... by a margin... To ignore our failing audit for now and wait to see if the new lodash merge github published. Like _.extend differ show up in those npm links own path, I 've provided have more along... This ; just rename everything and then pretend you did - Congrats '' module '' Errors: same. Let 's try not to derail the operation to collaborators, repository owner this. Would lodash function behaviors be a getting started post on the comment `` lazy default! To offer is what I did it beyond additional ways of doing so with and without lodash devs have their! ) just become an official build of `` lodash '' with this PR stunt here that exist. Merged project should be available under both names, for least friction publish it to under.

Rainbow Tops Plus Size, Mouth Svg For Face Mask, State Government Role In Education, Apple Custard Tart Recipe, Effective Teaching And Learning In Primary Schools, Ascend Fs10 Kayak Cabela's, College Of Basic Science And Humanities Fee Structure, Disney Princess Dresses For Toddlers, Simmons 1-4x20 Whitetail Classic Review,

Deja un comentario

Tu correo no será público

Lightbox Plugin